Quantcast
Channel: 9th Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 207

HUGE WIN FOR LENDING TREE!: Court Holds Tree is Not Responsible for Affiliate Calls in Pay Per Call Program And That’s Huge News

$
0
0

So Tree and I have buried the hatchet and are friends again– in fact, Lending Tree will be speaking at Law Conference of Champions III, how awesome is that!

But the BEST way to get on the Czar’s good side is to deliver huge industry-helping TCPA wins, and that is EXACTLY what Tree just did and I LOVE TO SEE IT.

In Sapan v. LendingTree, 8:23-cv-00071 (C.D. Cal March 18, 2025) the Court just entered judgment in favor of Tree finding it cannot be held responsible for calls made by affiliates in its pay per call program. Absolutely MASSIVE win,

The ruling turned on vicarious liability principles and applied the critical case of Jones v. Royal Administration Services, Inc., 887 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2018), which is the primary Ninth Circuit authority on the issue.

Under Jones a party must control the injury-causing conduct to be liable for calls. And where a party is making calls that may be transferred to any number of buyers the…

Read the complete article here...© 2025 Troutman Amin, LLP

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 207

Trending Articles